Thank you to everyone who attended the public meeting on September 28. We know the seating was
difficult for some people and we apologize for that. It’s very challenging to find places that are free,
with an adequate numbers of tables and chairs, to host meetings of this size.

We also apologize for being short-handed on facilitators and handouts, but we had at least 100 more
people attend than RSVPs we received.

Because many people did not have an opportunity to really see the Place Types map or talk with a
facilitator, we will be happy to meet with individual Neighborhood Associations for a follow-up walk-
through of these recommendations. We will contact the Neighborhood Association Presidents to
schedule those, if desired.

Below are links to information that was distributed at the meeting. We will also leave some hard copies
of these same materials at the YFD Recreation Centers by Monday afternoon for those who do not have
access to a computer or the internet.

  • Frequently Asked Questions – 9.28.19. HERE
  • Historic River-to-Ridge Draft Plan Power Point Presentation 9.28.19. HERE
  • Place Types Map – 9.28.19. HERE
  • Subarea Maps:
    Place Types – North 36×48 HERE
    Place Types – Middle 36×48 HERE
    Place Types – South 36×48 HERE
  • Tubman Site Information

We plan to post the full DRAFT of the Plan document on our website around October 21. At that time,
we will also leave a copy of the full document at the YFD Centers for public review.
After the Draft Plan is posted, there will be a one month public comment period.

Click HERE for a preview of the first 4 chapters of the DRAFT Historic River-to-Ridge Area Plan.  These first 4 chapters cover the following:

Chapter 1 – Introduction
Chapter 2 – Community Profile
Chapter 3 – Public Input
Chapter 4 – Vision & Principles

Still to come are the Chapters on Goals & Recommendations, Policy for Place Types & Centers, and Next Steps.  These remaining chapters will be posted October 21 for your review.  At that time, there will be a one month public comment period.

ALSO – You can still see the Community Choices Survey results HERE.

Previous website posts 


The RPA is taking a Centers approach to mapping future land use and Place Types, and this approach is being used for the Area 3 planning process.  What do we mean by a Centers approach?  Below is some information to help explain it. 


Centers are places that have a concentration of retail, restaurants, and office buildings.  Residential units are often located on the upper floors and light, artisanal industrial uses can even be included.   Multiple commercial buildings are often clustered around a public park or civic use, such as a courthouse or post office.  Centers often contain historic buildings that make them unique from other parts of the community.

Ideally, Centers are adequately spaced so they do not compete with one another, and to equitably provide retail options to nearby residents.  Centers are surrounded, and supported by, employment and residential areas.

Centers are compact and walkable places, with a network of connected streets and sidewalks, and multi-story buildings and shops that front directly onto the sidewalks.  A combination of on-street parking and shared parking lots behind the buildings provide convenient vehicular access to the businesses.

Centers come in different types and sizes.  In the more urban parts of Chattanooga, the RPA has identified four general types of Centers:  the Downtown Core, Town Centers, Village Centers, and Neighborhood Nodes.

Downtown Core

Town Center

Village Center

Neighborhood Node


The Downtown Core is, of course, the largest and most dense Center.

Next in size are Town Centers.  Town Centers serve a large area and, as a result, typically occupy 8 to 20 acres with building heights of up to five stories.  Fairly large buildings such as hotels, apartment buildings, or movie theaters are often located in Town Centers.

Village Centers are smaller (3 to 10 acres) and typically serve a more local market than Town Centers.  Village Centers have many of the same uses, including residential, but buildings are usually smaller (2 – 4 stories.)

Neighborhood Nodes are the smallest urban Center (2 acres or less.)  They are generally clustered around a single intersection and primarily provide goods and services to the immediate surrounding neighborhoods.  Buildings are only 1 to 3 stories high.


Centers provide a clustering of stores, offices and other uses in convenient locations to service the surrounding communities.  Because multi-family housing is also located within and immediately surrounding Centers, some people have the ability to walk to jobs, shopping, or recreation without requiring a car.

Transit requires a high concentration of businesses and housing to function well, so directing those types of uses to these compact Centers improves the viability of more frequent transit service.

Community festivals, farmers markets, and other events often take place in Centers. They are the places where residents can come together to celebrate their community’s traditions and culture.

Centers also have important economic benefits.  Retail businesses tend to be more successful when they are clustered together in a central location.  Each business can then benefit from the customers drawn to the area by neighboring businesses.  Centers can also provide for a more efficient use of limited City resources.  Infrastructure costs for sidewalks, street lights, street trees and other amenities can be targeted to designated Centers instead of spread thin across an entire area.


We know the national retail market is changing dramatically due to impacts from online shopping, large discount stores and growing customer preferences for more unique shopping experiences.  As a result the number of new “bricks and mortar” stores is likely to be very limited.  One only has to drive along a commercial corridor in most any city to notice the many closed or marginal businesses reflecting these changes in the retail market.

We therefore need to be very strategic about where new retail is located.  It needs to be clustered in mixed-use, walkable Centers that also support transit.  Area 3 participants in the Community Choices survey also clearly expressed a preference for walkable retail Centers.

Based on these retail trends, community input, and an analysis of traffic volumes, transit routes, population densities and other factors, the RPA has identified a number of locations in Area 3 that may be designated as commercial Centers.  These Centers are where new retail development should be encouraged going forward.

In his new book, Principles of Urban Retail Planning and Development, Robert Gibbs, a national Retail/Marketing expert, suggests that a 30,000 square foot Center (which includes a mix of retail and other uses) requires about 2,000 households within a half-mile (which is about how far people are typically willing to walk) to be viable.  For comparison:

  • Thirty thousand square feet of retail equates to about three Dollar General stores.
  • Chain grocery stores, such as Food City or Publix, average about 50,000 square feet.
  • A small, local “mom & pop” retail shop is typically about 4,000 square feet.
  • Area 3, as a whole, contains about 9,574 households.


A 30,000 square foot Center
(which includes a mix of retail
and other uses)
requires about 2,000
households within
a half-mile (which is about
how far people are
typically willing to walk)
to be viable.

Based on these trends, the RPA is recommending a limited number of commercial Centers in Area 3.  There may be potential for two Village Centers in Area 3, and Glass Street and McCallie Avenue are locations that are being explored for those larger Village Centers.  However, most of the Centers in Area 3 will be smaller Neighborhood Nodes – encompassing only a few lots around an intersection – so as not to dilute this limited retail market, and will be located throughout Area 3 to provide access to the greatest number of residents.  This does not mean that retail won’t be allowed anywhere else, but instead, when future requests for commercial zoning occur, the Area 3 Plan will recommend that such zoning be directed to these designated Centers.  Over time, this clustering of retail will lead to the more mixed-use, walkable development the community desires.


The major corridors between these Centers can still be excellent locations for other businesses, such as offices, light artisanal industries, churches or civic buildings.  Additionally, these corridors can accommodate new higher-density, multi-family residential uses to help supply a growing need for more diverse and affordable housing choices.  Clustering such higher-density residential around the Centers, and along major corridors, also leaves the existing single-family residential neighborhoods intact, without the encroachment of multi-family housing, which was another strong desire expressed by Area 3 residents in the Community Choices Survey and public meetings.

Commercial Corridor


During June, the RPA chose six of the Centers locations being considered and invited property owners from each to an exploratory meeting to discuss some conceptual ideas and to share any future plans they had for their property.  The presidents from each Neighborhood Association bordering these Centers were also invited to participate in the discussion.  Representatives from the City’s Economic & Community Development, Capital Budgeting, and Transportation departments also participated in most of the meetings. The following are some of the key points that came out of these meetings.

  • The walkability of these Centers must be improved with better pedestrian crossings, wider sidewalks, transit shelters, on-street parking, and bike lanes.
  • Many existing commercial buildings will require substantial investments / incentives to bring them up to current codes.
  • City capital improvement funds are always limited and should be targeted to these designated Centers, once they are finalized, to make the most efficient use of tax revenues and to get the “biggest bank for the buck.”
  • The City should use its assets (capital budget, grants, property, etc.) to support the goals in the Area 3 Plan.
  • Shared parking is needed behind commercial buildings.
  • In order to support the businesses in these Centers, higher-density, multi-family residential needs to be built around them and along the connecting corridors. Most of the potential Centers being studied have large, vacant sites or buildings nearby that could be redeveloped for these uses.
  • Many commercial properties need better landscaping and storefront design.
  • Pedestrian connections to nearby parks and schools need to be improved.
  • Zoning for these Centers needs to change to allow a mix of uses (including residential and live/work units) and to promote walkability.
  • Overgrown lots and litter are problems in many locations.

You can access the summary HERE.


Focused on one or more of the top issues identified by the Area 3 Community, the background sections for each survey were intended to provide informative data and a summary of relevant trends. Click
below for a link to each.


Three public workshops were held in March at the YFD Recreation Centers in Area 3 to involve more community members.  Lots of school children participated in these workshops and shared many creative ideas.  See a summary of the Workshop Results HERE.


Attendees at the January 26 public meeting worked in 12 different groups, drawing on maps of Area 3, and providing suggested locations for new commercial centers, housing, major employers, greenways and parks, as well as places where pedestrian/bicycle facilities are needed.

The Staff has consolidated the information from those maps into a composite map for each subarea (north, middle and south.)  Some common themes and locations for new development are emerging.  The maps generated at each table are available HERE.


During the Kick-off meeting in June, over 150 attendees identified some critical issues. Results from that first public meeting are attached HERE.


Sign up below to receive periodic updates on our progress and to stay informed about upcoming meetings.
Please contact Pam Glaser, Principal Planner at the RPA if you have questions or need additional information.   423-643-5911


Area 3 generally falls within the following boundaries:

  • North: South Chickamauga Creek
  • East: Missionary Ridge
  • South: Interstate-24; and
  • West: Central Avenue, the railroad, and the Tennessee River

Area 3 includes the following Neighborhood Associations:

      • Avondale
      • Battery Heights
      • Boyce Station
      • Bushtown
      • Churchville
      • Ferger Place
      • Gaylon Heights
      • Glass Farms
      • Glenwood
      • Highland Park
      • Oak Grove
      • Orchard Knob
      • Park Central
      • Ridgedale
      • Riverside
      • Waterhaven
      • Wheeler


Advisory Committee:  Serving as a representative sampling of the various interests throughout the community, the Area 3 Advisory Committee is comprised of neighborhood association presidents and a handful of other business and community leaders.  Their main objective is to generate ideas, disseminate information to the Area 3 community, and provide feedback to the staff.

What is an Area Plan?  For more information click HERE.


If you would like to learn more about the Area 3 planning process or sign up for email updates, please subscribe!